Search results

Yes, but Smarty doesn't matter. I am using Lscache and Smarty together in different applications and notice no issues. At the end the output and the content of cached files on server is always pure HTML. What is your impression based on?

Why to define an ESI block for mega menu? Such content is not critical or in your opinion why should an ESI block should be defined for a mega menu? What is special for mega menu? Whenever possible don't define an ESI block if you don't really need it. For example, your shopping cart is a MUST...

An ESI block is like a hole in your page and can have different cache rules than surrounding content. Each ESI "hole" has affect on performance and the more ESI blocks are defined the more affect it has on performance.

This is the sense of the crawler.....

"We no longer recommend using PageSpeed. The module has not been maintained for some time now, and as such, it may cause stability issues. " https://docs.litespeedtech.com/products/lsadc/moresettings/#pagespeed

ModSecurity + optional LiteSpeed/Commodo ModSecurity rule set, but each UA you want to block must me added by hand. If you have cPanel ConfigServer Security & Firewall is recommended, because CSF supports ModSecurity. https://www.configserver.com/cp/csf.html

If you don't have a control panel like cPanel/WHM or other supported control panel. If you have cPanel and ModSecurity nothing else has to be done.

Static sources like images can't be cached neither by LScache nor any other HTTP Cache. Static sources will automatically be cached by browser.

Try this https://docs.litespeedtech.com/lscache/lscwp/admin/#enabling-the-crawler

Control Panel?

Yes! It's the same like with Apache in .htaccess, but know only REQUEST source. Status code is not supported by Apache. SetEnvIf Request_URI "\.css$ " dontlog SetEnvIf Request_URI "\.js$ " dontlog .... https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_setenvif.html

For Wordpress users: https://docs.litespeedtech.com/lscache/lscwp/ts-optimize/#disk-space-filling-fast

Maybe this could help you to understand why "Google Core Web Vitals" and not Pagespeed is important. Pagespeed is only a test tool. The right score will be generated by each user who has Chrome browser installed. Chrome generates "User Experience Report" and sends data to Google and only these...

Configuration has to be done in Apache style: /etc/apache2/conf.d/includes/pre_virtualhost_global.conf <IfModule LiteSpeed> VhostBandwidthLimit 1024000 </IfModule> For bandwith limit of 1000KB max.. Not tested, but should work.

Did you already check this: https://docs.litespeedtech.com/cp/cpanel/tunings/#virtual-host-level-limiting

Yes, it does. Why shouldn't it support .htaccess or what is not supported?! https://www.litespeedtech.com/products/litespeed-web-server/editions

I just did some further tests and you won't believe it... noconntimeout directive works. It was my fault. A typo in rewrite rule to limit noconnection timeout to the crawler has caused it, so I am very sorry! Ashes on my head! :(

Sorry, this is not great. Offering a CLI variant of crawler is an option, but not the one and only option. This option is intended to run in cronjob, but is only a small part of complex application with a lot of features and functions. This comment is like a knockout for LiteSpeed Enterprise...

For testing and debugging I have the crawler script extracted from main application to get it work in CLI. For this test there is no custom connection timeout in .htaccess defined. The crawler is running without interruption until script it is finished, but only in CLI! To me, it looks like...

Support for OpenLiteSpeed -> https://forum.openlitespeed.org/