Search results

I just crawled your page within 1 hour., 16.000 Urls with 11 different cache profiles. Who is the stupid man? It's not just me.

Yes, Mr. Magic :) reduced on this it is maaaaaaagic! :) You've earned an award for it Because nobody can accept it for his own use. Your load is related on your server but each server has different ressources. That is why Linux offers a method to check it really, but always related to the used...

This is not an accepted method. It differs from server to server and depends on many facts. Value "100" can be everything, but gives no information about if a server is overloaded or in idle mode. Why don't you accept what is "law"?

To explain what seems to be "magic" related to the disk space, here are some additional information. First of all what @AndreyPopov found out is not magic. LiteSpeed only forgot to add a default curl option in code. This option has affect on how cache files are stored. If this option is set it...

The fastest LiteSpeed Cache Warmer for almost any Application and not only for LiteSpeed. Check it out at https://www.wp.cachecrawler.com/kitt/, a Demo for Wordpress. User: Demo Pass: Demo This Demo Account has restrictions,so not all Functions can be accessed with this Account.Get more...

To check the load of a server there is a common technic from Linux. Checking the number of used processes gives no information about the load. You can simple check the load if you run "uptime" in command line interface. The result you get displayed gives you more information about the load, but...

Install https://phpsysinfo.github.io/phpsysinfo/ to check the real load. It also works on shared hosting Define "recache". What is recache? A warmup with completely purged cached before? Again, there is no magic option. Documentation about curl is plublic, not secret. Only LS forgot to add...

Yes, that works, but not for cache of ESI holes and the current case is about a ESI hole.

Yes really, but again, you should use any translator!

I already understand you right, but you either don't or you can't read?! There is no br, gzip or deflate depending compression for cached files. This is not because I could believe it. It is because I got this information from Big Boss of LiteSpeed. Do you think I'm just making up clever...

How? Simple answer, request a page with a client that supports any encoding compression. What is the problem? You can test it by your own. Use curl and set custom "Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,br" header and make a another curl request with "Accept-Encoding: identity" header. Check cached file...

Stupid question! It doesn't matter if content-encoding is br, gzip or deflate for cached files. Whenever 1 of these 3 kinds of content-encoding compressions is used lscache always compresses dynamic content, but not different depending on br, gzip or deflate. Only if there is no compression or...

If hosting would be okay there wouldn't missing almost everything what OLS/LSWS identifies. Take the board in front of your head away!

You are the one who understand complety nothing. You expect a proper working of your OLS, but the environment of your server misses almost everything of OLS and LSWS!

Do you have a board in front of your head or are you doing it on purpose? I'll show you what's wrong with your hosting and you insult me? What's wrong with you?

And what? You have OLS and you use LScache?! And anything else is missing!

Relax yourself :) Nobody wants to take anything away from you or attack you. If I'm speaking here, it's probably because there's no one else. This forum is lonely and poorly supported. Anyway, let's talk about logic. You complain that your "OLS" server doesn't work as you expect. Have you ever...

There is no "multiple times". If browser supports br, content-encoding is available with the first request. Where does this statement come from?

For static sources your server uses br for content-encoding, but this is only related to content-encoding and not for cached files. If I check your response headers your server displays "nginx" and not OLS as server software. Does your host use nginx as proxy in front of your hosting? Maybe this...