Search results

Looks like authorization of fcgi authroizer has been passed. Do you get core dump if there is no authorizer configured? What is in the response of the authorizer? Is context for URI "/" a static context with location set to the document root of that virtual host? If you know how to let a...

Acutally, it is our current AJP implementation, LSWS serves the static contents and forwards request to dynamic content to backend servlet engine. There are two way to define dynamic content, one is via script handler (for jsp files), another one is via servlet context (for servlets). It should...

Yes, uploaded, just replace linux with freebsd in the URL.

Please try http://www.litespeedtech.com/packages/2.0/lsws-2.1RC1-std-i386-linux.tar.gz should be fixed.

I think you should use a "static" context instead of a "fcgi" context for "/".

support for <Files> block will be added in 2.1 release, there is no good alternative right now, so there is no way to make it work in .htaccess. However, it is doable with lsws matching context, from web admin interface, create a matching static context like "URI=> exp:(.*)/index"...

You have done half of the configurations for fcgi authorizer, still need to put the authorizer in use by selecting the defined fcgi authorizer under the context that need to be protected. Value of "maxConns" and "instances" looks too high, unless you have a very slow authorizer and a busy web...

Yes, we can add somthing similar. Our next goal is to make litespeed be able to run off apache's configuration with same functionality.

Please try 2.0.3 release, this should be addressed.

Thanks. :wink: For somple reason it is not easy to get accurate count of idle connections. Should be fixed in new released 2.0.3.

You can use URL rewrite for complex rules. I am sorry, but I need to tell you that you may not able to use litespeed to powered your porn websites, we can going to change our license agreement. please do not advertise your porn sites here. :(

It depends on how the mapping is configured, for explicit domain name matching, hash map is used in LSWS, so it should be O(1), for wild card domain name (with * or ?) matching, regex is used and each pattern has to be processed one by one, so it is O(n). Scalability of virtual mapping is...

Have you turned on the rewrite log, what was it?

Yes, that's cause by assert() calls, assert() are used somewhere to guard against something not suppose to happen. I can pin-point the location if you can send me a core dump, just enable core dump from the admin interface. Thanks.

Yes, you can. You can also strip the debug symbol of those executables, like "strip -g lshttpd", remove updateagent if it is not needed. Also, those license files. I think it is pretty much what you can do.

Sorry about that. %{REQUEST_FILENAME} might be implemented slightly different between LiteSpeed and Apache, litespeed always try to figure out correct PATH_INFO, so it may always end up with a directory. We will take a closer look and make LiteSpeed behave exactly like apache. For now, I...

Right now there is no direct translation for "action" directive like that, we will add configuration like that later, however, I think you can archive the same effect using URL rewrite now. :-) Make sure /cgi-tdb/bin/tdbengine is configured to serve as CGI, then rewrite all requests to ".prg"...

It is a bug, fixed. Please download 2.0.2 again if you want.

You are welcome. :lol: I think it is better to avoid the piped logger when possible to get the best performance, if performance is the biggest concern, still a lot of overhead involved. :-)

"pool" number in the real time report is the current size of connection pool for that external application, is up to the "Max connections" configuration. lsws dynamically adjust the pool size and keep the pool as small as possible. So, in your case, 2 is sufficient to handle all requests...