deliberations on logging performance with litespeed

[nikss]

I want to give access in real time to vhost logs for users through my web application.


1.piped logging - php or perl script to database
2.split logs - according to $VH_NAME

What do you think about that? Which solution will be the best for overall performance of litespeed??
How splitting logs per vhost $VH_NAME-access.log compare to one central access.log ??

 

[mistwang]

slpit logs should have better performance since it is only direct file operations.

 

[nikss]

slpit logs should have better performance since it is only direct file operations.

from your experience
how splitting logs (in %) slow down overall performance of litespeed comparing to single access.log ??

 

[mistwang]

from your experience
how splitting logs (in %) slow down overall performance of litespeed comparing to single access.log ??

No. it does not.