Search results

Can you build a sample application using redirect_to and send it to us?

Looks like your application may write some debug message to stdout before the response header was sent.

Try upgrade ruby-lsapi, I have added a new release to rubyforge a while ago. That release should work well with redirect_to. We probably will not announce it officially, as we need to release a new release soon.

We probably could not help much on this. It is completely a Ruby / kernel problem, maybe a bug in kernel was hit. You have to use some kernel debug tool to find out where the extra CPU was used. It is beyond the knowledge of most of us.

Yes, there is a limit for each configuration entry. We will increase the limit in next release. But, 1470 lines of rewrite rules is too much, It will slowdown the server a lot. If possible, you can use a rewrite map to simplify the rewrite rules, and it will run a lot faster.

I think it should work with Standard edition as well. We will double check.

No, you do not need another control panel, nor Apache.

I think most of them are PHP modules, so it will take about the same amount of effort as with Apache. LSWS has its own web admin console to manage web sites. You can use WebMin to manage other part of the system if you prefer.

maybe mod_perl?

Yes. No, LiteSpeed will not affect the PHP, it is completely a PHP issue. Please double check the MySQL socket configuration in the info page. Also, you can check lsws/logs/error.log and stderr.log see if PHP dump any error message.

Yes, it is.

No, it will not work. You have to use rewrite rules to implement this.

sure, will do.

Yes, there is for later build of lsphp. do cp -f admin/fcgi-bin/admin_php fcgi-bin/lsphp

It is unlimited.

We can add that in next release. Are you using it in a vhost template?

A problem with subdomain configuration. This issue will be addressed in 3.2.2 release.

Are you sure? The RoR vhost templates uses RailsRunner.rb, which is like a universal dispatch.lsapi, performance should be the same.

Solution should be similar to this http://www.litespeedtech.com/support/forum/showthread.php?t=1143

The apache configuration file field was updated to make it wider, looks like the read permission should not be required. Will fix it with a update . You can manually change http_config.xml in the mean time. Sorry about that.