Search results

  1. B

    Litespeed Cache and Symfony

    Hello @NiteWave , I've read the documentation and the problem here is that the same url (including index) appear different if it's a logged user or an anonymous user. So probably the best thing is to use cookies (like the documentation for prestashop); what do you thing about this solution? If...
  2. B

    Litespeed Cache and Symfony

    Hello, I'm using Symfony as framework for a project. I've found about how to configure Symfony for Varnish (http://symfony.com/doc/current/http_cache/varnish.html) but I'm wondering if it's possible to use symfony with Litespeed Cache, and how to configure that. Thanks
  3. B

    OpenSSL Vulnerabilities

    https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160926.txt https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt
  4. B

    OpenSSL and DROWN

    Hello, Have you also updated OpenSSL in Litespeed with 5.0.14 and 5.1.4? https://drownattack.com Thanks
  5. B

    What about builds?

    Hello, I remember with version 5 that a big news was build numbers. Today this service is not available (but it was): Maybe a changelog for every build is too much (but it's a standard in software today); at least I need to know if I'm aligned with the build. I read every day about user asking...
  6. B

    Restore default settings

    Hello, is there an option to restore default settings (without reinstalling)? Thank you
  7. B

    Draft 14?

    hello, I'm using lsws 5.0.3 I've tested a website with https via https://www.h2check.org and it results http/2 draft 14 In your blog post you say in April that draft 17 is supported..can you help me to understand? :)
  8. B

    How to fix the report symlink

    Yes, I can disable this alert, but litespeed is the only false positive, and this is an important feature of CSF, so why disable this? :)
  9. B

    How to fix the report symlink

    Hello, in a cPanel server with CSF Firewall, I receive every 30 minutes this email: Time: Mon May 18 17:28:44 2015 +0200 File: /tmp/lshttpd/.rtreport Reason: Suspicious symlink (->/tmp/lshttpd/status/.rtreport) Owner: nobody:nobody (99:99) Action: No action taken Can you fix lsws in order to...
  10. B

    [Solved] LiteSpeed Cache + Joomla

    Hello Scot, I've created the plugin for 1.5, 2.5 and 3.x. Now I don't use ls cache anymore, so I can't test the plugin. I hope to use lscache again in future and I hope in a better support for dynamic applications (for example virtuemart for guest, contact forms, or responsive template via...
  11. B

    Litespeed Standard Version query

    Because if you enable phpsuexec, folders and files need user permission: For example chown -R username:group public_html/ :)
  12. B

    Question about LSCache hit rate calculation

    Hi, i'm extremely new in LSCache, and I want to ask something about hit rate. For example, I've a website, and it use about 40 request per page view: 10 css, 10 js, 9 images and the page php/html. So, the LSCache hit rate, the first time is 0 hit, 1 miss (because the webpage is not cached, and...
  13. B

    [Solved] LiteSpeed Cache + Joomla

    I've created a plugin for Joomla 2.5 (not tested for 3.x yet). I'll release soon with a guide for LSCache and Joomla :)
  14. B

    [Solved] LiteSpeed Cache + Joomla

    Hello, what about Joomla 2.5 or 3.x? The file controller.php is different and I can't find that line. Thank you
  15. B

    [Resolved] litespeed files locking

    I've tried with 100K, but this is the error: number valid range: 0 - 16384 *number exceeds maximum allowed
  16. B

    CVE-2014-0224 Vulnerability

    Hello, look here: Is Litespeed vulnerable?
  17. B

    [Resolved] Is Litespeed vulnerable?

    I don't work for Litespeed and I don't know, I'm sorry :( wait a reply from someone at Litespeed :)
  18. B

    [Resolved] Is Litespeed vulnerable?

    4.2.12 is still in "beta" I think, but it seem stable for production for me. Run this: /usr/local/lsws/admin/misc/lsup.sh -f -v 4.2.12 and you'll update to 4.2.12 ;)
  19. B

    [Resolved] Is Litespeed vulnerable?

    Yes, I can confirm now it's not vulnerable. Sorry for the mistake
  20. B

    [Resolved] Is Litespeed vulnerable?

    A new exploit was found on OpenSSL: http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140605.txt Litespeed appear vulnerable in 4.2.12 with this test: http://ccsbug.exposed Can you confirm? (Apache appear not vulnerable after CentOS package update).
Top